Like many people out there, when the “news” (and by that, I mean my Twitter feed) started burning up about the House’s Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and the Senate’s Protect IP Act (PIPA), I jumped right on the “anti-SOPA” bandwagon. I’m not ready to have the Internet I’ve come to know and love changed irrevocably by the government. I’m not ready to have the government step in and regulate what we can and can’t talk about online.
And then I went out to dinner with my family for my grandmother’s birthday. The subject of SOPA came up near the end of the meal, and I mentioned that I was against it. My aunt immediately countered, asking, “Oh, so are you for piracy?” I didn’t have enough brain power at the time, but I imagine the “No, I’m for Freedom of Speech” rant that followed made me sound like a college freshman extolling the virtues of legalizing marijuana. It’s time I come up with a more articulate stand.
The core value of SOPA makes sense. Please don’t hate me, Internet, but it does. Copyright infringement is out there, and yes, it should be illegal. Intellectual property theft is a thing that happens, it’s not okay, and yes, there should be real and tangible consequences. And yes, there are some websites out there that enable copyright infringement and intellectual property theft by offering them a voice.
But here’s the deal. It used to be the case that if, say, you were going to be gone on a Thursday night, it was easy as pie (well, for my generation) to just set the VCR to tape that landmark episode of “ER” so you’d be able to watch it the next day. It used to be the case that if you heard that your favorite song was coming up on the radio, you could pop a blank tape into the cassette deck and press that round red “Record” button just as it was coming on and hope your mom wouldn’t fire up the vacuum and wreck the recording. When the Internet came around, VCRs and tape decks were replaced by a digital recorder, and sharing an episode online became just as easy as bringing the tape to work or school and passing it on.
And I don’t see anything wrong with that. If it’s a show I love, you better be sure that I’ll be there to buy the next season on DVD. If it’s a show I used to love, it’s a show I’ll go out and spend money on. But if it’s a show I love, and I’m not, say, on my couch at 7:00 on a Monday night because I want to go to yoga, I should be able to go to the CBS website after “How I Met Your Mother” has aired from here to Hawaii and be able to watch it online. Because you know I’ll be spending my hard-earned taxable American dollars on it at my local Best Buy as soon as I can.
I think this bill is indicative of a broader issue: availability. The companies who have sponsored it (and I won’t even get started about how wrong that is) are making it clear that they have the power to limit the availability of their content. That’s not the way the world works anymore. We now live in a world with a short attention span and a “GIMME” attitude. It’s annoying, yes, but we have the tools to make things happen and we’re not afraid to use them.
Here’s the thing: we also have MONEY.
What if your favorite television show had a Kickstarter-like project, where you could pre-pay for that season’s DVD at the beginning of the year, and over the course of the season, have exclusive access to streaming online content like episodes a week before they air, or interviews with the writers, crew or cast? What if the Disney Channel went back through its archives and offered digital copies of its older shows like “So Weird” and “The Famous Jett Jackson” for $1 an episode? What if Nickelodeon did that with “Hey Dude” and “The Adventures of Pete and Pete”? And I’d definitely pay $1 an episode to have access to Neil Patrick Harris and Tony Shaloub’s short-lived masterpiece of a show, “Stark Raving Mad.”
My thoughts on this are simple, really, and I know that this long-ass post hasn’t done a great job of making it look that way. For that, I apologize. I feel that SOPA and PIPA are backward-thinking articles of legislation. I think they’d view my “where do they go from here” post about Firefly from a while back as copyright infringement, even though that wasn’t the intention at all, and this whole site would be censored as a result.
The government and the television, movie and music companies behind SOPA and PIPA need to be forward-thinking. The world has changed around them, and it’s time to figure out new ways to get their content to the masses. It’s time to step up and give the people what they want – and what they will find a way to get whether you help them or not. I’m not for piracy. I’m for availability. And I’m for moving media forward.
To that end, the White House has proposed a new piece of legislation as an alternative to SOPA and PIPA, called the Online Protection and Enforcement of Digital Trade Act, or OPEN. To give you a picture of the differences, SOPA and PIPA are supported by media conglomerates, and OPEN is supported by Google and Facebook. OPEN is a start. To learn more, check out KeeptheWebOpen.com.
And that ends today’s rant. Tune in later on this week, when I’ll be discussing what I perceive to be the television show that is best using social media to its advantage: Syfy’s “Being Human.”